Single Case Agreement Request

Posted Dezember 17th, 2020 by admin

There are many therapeutic processes, such as ABA therapy, where continuity of care is essential to achieving treatment goals. When a customer switches to a new insurance provider, it is essential to maintain continuity of care or put in place a transition plan to a new network provider. In many of these scenarios, it is often necessary to negotiate an agreement on a case-by-case basis. In the case of a patient who needs to move from your care to a new network provider or a patient who prefers to remain in your care, you may need to help the patient make the request to the insurer. As a negotiation process, there are things you can do to streamline the SCA process. This advice not only facilitates the review of the application, but also helps to ensure that the patient does not have unnecessary care errors. The SCA will also provide approved CPT codes, start and end dates and number of meetings. You can request an extension of the SCA if there are only a few sessions left (2 to 3). It should be noted that insurance companies have a legal obligation to properly treat patients by well-trained professionals. Therefore, if the insurance plan does not cover off-network services, and there are no in-network providers with the specified specialty, then you, as a qualified provider, can negotiate your usual full fees as a meeting rate for new patients. This is because the patient does not simply choose to see you, but is forced to deal with insufficient providers in the network.

In this case, the patient usually makes the case with the assurance of an ACS with you before starting treatment. The client has tried and cannot find a practitioner or supplier in his network that meets his needs in a way that allows him to feel comfortable. For treatment with ABA, this must be done before the start of treatment. In an off-grid scenario like this, it may be possible to use a case-by-case agreement to ensure that your client has the coverage he or she needs to receive the care he or she depends on as a doctor or therapist. If the patient has recently switched insurance providers, the insurance company may accept a limited number of sessions (approximately 10) and a period (for example. B 60 days since the insurance change) to allow the patient to continue treatment with the current network provider while switching to a network provider. If there is evidence that the person could pose a danger to himself or others, or if it affects the patient psychologically or mentally (for example. B failures in the progress of therapy), if this proves necessary to switch to an in-network provider, a case could be advanced for an increase in adequacy with the current provider. Examples: a patient has an uncertain bond and finds it very difficult to trust others.

The therapeutic relationship already established with the current supplier can be considered as a factor in granting the SCA. This is particularly true if, in the past, there is evidence that the individual poses a danger to himself or others, or if he is at risk of suffering a serious setback from his mental health. Case-by-case agreements are most common in patients who have created trust problems and developed a professional relationship with their current ABA provider. It is also important to note that some insurance providers have standard protocols for a case-by-case negotiation.

Comments are closed.